MASTER MONOGRAPH: AUTHORITY AND ACCOUNTABILITY IN CHRISTIAN PERSPECTIVE
A Canonical, Diagnostic, and Empirical Synthesis Across 7 Monograph Appendices
The Empty Throne & The Fiduciary Mandate: The elevated seat of power stands vacant, framed by monumental stone architecture evoking an ancient council or judgment hall.
The Scroll & Basin at the Base: An open covenant scroll (representing the Deuteronomy 17 requirement placing the monarch under the written statutory law) and the servant's washbasin and cloth (referencing the John 13 foot-washing mandate and diakonia) rest humbly at the foot of the throne steps.
The Modern Looming Shadow: Cast along the stark rear wall is the sharp, angular silhouette of contemporary institutional power—government domes and modern transmission infrastructure—juxtaposing fiduciary moral restraint against modern information-era governance
Document Designation: Monograph Series: Authority and Accountability in Christian Perspective
Citation Standard: Chicago Manual of Style (Superscript Callouts, Full Footnotes & Bibliography)
Theoretical Framework: JROspace ABCDE Model (Appendix A) & Appendix X Canonical Baseline (67% OT / 33% NT)
I. Executive Abstract & Monograph Thesis Statement
Can civic, political, or religious authority exist without moral, procedural, and institutional accountability under Christian scripture and theology? This Master Monograph synthesizes seven foundational research appendices (Appendices A, B, C, D, E, F, and X) to construct a definitive canonical, diagnostic, and empirical critique of unaccountable power.¹
A. The Dual Monograph Thesis
1. The Canonical Requirement (Scriptural Law): Christian scripture—across both the Old Testament covenantal law and New Testament Red Letters—establishes that human authority is strictly conditional, fiduciary, and non-possessory. Any assertion of authority that rejects ethical obligation, verification, or stewardship is treated throughout the biblical canon as structurally illegitimate, hypocritical, and subject to self-executing collapse.²
2. The Nationalist Contradiction (Information Operations): Modern Christian nationalism operates as an Information Operations (IO) strategy of 'authority-pairing without accountability.' Political actors systematically deploy sacred vocabulary ('biblical worldview,' 'faith-aligned governance') as symbolic branding to seek cultural dominance and unearned civic legitimacy while discarding the ethical burdens, harm ownership, and mandatory care for the vulnerable required by authentic Christian theology.³
B. Methodological Architecture Across the 7 Appendices
The monograph brings together four distinct disciplines into a single diagnostic framework:
Canonical Theology (Appendices X & F): Establishing the 2:1 biblical distribution (67% Old Testament / 33% New Testament Red Letters) and deconstructing selective scriptural enforcement through the Leviticus 25 Jubilee mandate.⁴
Sociological & Media Analysis (Appendices B & D): Evaluating how political movements use religious branding for cultural dominance (Whitehead & Perry, Gorski) and contrasting it with classical theological ethics (Hauerwas, Bonhoeffer, Yoder, Augustine).⁵
Diagnostic Systems Modeling (Appendix A): Applying the 5-stage JROspace ABCDE Model (Identity Claim, Obligation Rejection, Outcome Ownership Avoidance, Accountability Pressure, and Collapse/Narrative Insulation).⁶
Empirical Case Studies (Appendices C & E): Executing granular policy-to-scripture crosswalks and auditing Project 2025 architects Russell Vought (OMB) and Brendan Carr (FCC).⁷
II. Part I: The Canonical Baseline — The Inseparability of Authority and Accountability
A. The 2:1 Canonical Ratio (~67% Old Testament / ~33% New Testament Red Letters)
An exhaustive textual audit of Christian scripture reveals that authority and accountability are structurally linked across both testaments in a precise 2:1 distribution:⁸
1. Old Testament Covenantal Law (~67% Canonical Weight)
Bilateral Covenantal Architecture (B'rit): Divine authority is never granted as an absolute, unreviewable right. In God's covenant with Abraham (Gen. 17:1) and Israel at Sinai (Exod. 19:5), authority is explicitly conditioned upon active obedience and blameless moral integrity (Tamim).⁹
Mandatory Social Justice (Tzedakah): In the Hebrew prophetic tradition, authority is validated exclusively through the concrete production of justice (tzedakah) and protection of the vulnerable (Ps. 82:3). Worship divorced from ethical performance is rejected as religious hypocrisy (Amos 5:24).¹⁰
The Statutory 'Law of the King' (Deut. 17:14–20): The Torah establishes explicit constitutional limits on executive power. Monarchs are forbidden from accumulating excessive wealth, multiplying horses (military expansion), or exalting themselves above their constituents. Crucially, the king must personally copy and read the statutory law daily, placing the executive firmly under the law.¹¹
Prophetic Audits & Divine Deposition (Qelalot): When leaders abuse power, prophetic checks (Samuel against Saul, Nathan against David, Elijah against Ahab, Ezekiel 34 against exploitative shepherds) confront them. Unrepented abuse triggers mandatory covenantal curses (qelalot) resulting in public exposure, dynastic deposition, and institutional collapse.¹²
2. New Testament Red-Letter Realization (~33% Canonical Weight)
Subversion of Dominance (Diakonia): Jesus explicitly rejects the Gentile model of hierarchical dominance ('lord it over them'). In Matthew 20:25–28 and the John 13 Foot-Washing Mandate, Christ redefines valid authority as low-status servant stewardship (diakonia).¹³
Condemnation of Pharisaic Hypocrisy (Hypokrisis): In the Seven Woes of Matthew 23 and Luke 11:46, Jesus delivers His fiercest denunciations against leaders who claim religious titles and impose institutional burdens while refusing personal duty, internal justice, and active mercy.¹⁴
The Proportional Stewardship Audit (Oikonomia): Human leaders are derivative managers (oikonomoi) overseeing property belonging exclusively to the Master. Under Luke 12:48 ('To whom much is given, much will be required'), elevated rank exponentially multiplies required obligation.¹⁵
Final Judgment Criterion (Krisis & Eleos): In Matthew 25:31–46, eschatological judgment (krisis) is decided strictly by concrete acts of active mercy (eleos) toward the hungry, sick, stranger, and imprisoned—proving that treatment of the vulnerable is the ultimate metric of valid power.¹⁶
B. The Hermeneutical Firewall — Leviticus 25 Jubilee & Selective Enforcement
Modern appeals to 'biblical authority' frequently commit a fatal category error by cherry-picking isolated Old Testament moral statutes while ignoring the statutory economic reset laws of Leviticus 25 (Jubilee). Appendix F deconstructs this selective enforcement:¹⁷
The Legal Equivalence Principle: Leviticus presents sexual ethics, ceremonial purity, and economic justice as an unfragmented covenant code. Invoking Leviticus 18:22 to enforce civic control while discarding Leviticus 25 (mandatory debt cancellation, land return, and slave release) is hermeneutically indefensible: 'Selective scripture is still selective power.'¹⁸
Red-Letter Continuity (Luke 4 & Acts 4): Jesus inaugurates His ministry in Luke 4:18–19 by reading Isaiah 61—proclaiming Jubilee ('the year of the Lord's favor'). In Acts 4:34–35, the apostolic church in Jerusalem voluntarily embodied Jubilee as an active economic model, eliminating poverty entirely through shared resources.¹⁹
Pauline Binary Hermeneutic: In Galatians 5:3 and Galatians 3:24, Paul establishes that the Law is an indivisible unit ('every man who accepts circumcision is obligated to keep the whole law'). Using Old Testament law as a selective hammer for civic dominance while rejecting its economic obligations destroys the integrity of Christian gospel witness.²⁰
III. Part II: Deconstructing Christian Nationalism as Symbolic Branding & Information Operations
A. Information Operations (IO) Mechanics
Appendices B and D demonstrate that Christian nationalism functions as a sophisticated Information Operations (IO) campaign designed to achieve political dominance through religious identity manipulation:²¹
Authority-Pairing Without Accountability: Political actors systematically pair sacred vocabulary ('biblical values,' 'God-ordained authority') with political campaigns to signal group identity. This strategy claims unearned moral legitimacy while shielding policy proposals from empirical audit.²²
Media Amplification & Symbolic Collapse: Uncritical news reporting frequently echoes religious buzzwords without auditing policy actions against scripture. This allows political figures to maintain a pious public persona while quietly enacting policies that inflict direct material harm on poor and working-class citizens.²³
B. Classical & Contemporary Theological Refutations
Prominent theological ethicists across church history firmly reject the instrumentalization of Christian faith for political dominance:
Stanley Hauerwas: Authentic Christian faith is defined by cross-bearing accountability and church-centered witness, not by seeking state hegemony or enforcing Christian culture through coercive state power.²⁴
Dietrich Bonhoeffer: Theological ethics require direct, physical intervention against state-induced harm inflicted on the vulnerable. True faith refuses to grant ultimate authority to any secular political movement.²⁵
John Howard Yoder: Christian responsibility demands non-negotiable ownership of harm mitigation. The way of Jesus rejects the sword of worldly dominance in favor of radical, self-sacrificing servant stewardship.²⁶
Augustine of Hippo (City of God): Claiming divine sanction while rejecting justice and moral obligation transforms civil governance into pure criminal enterprise: 'Remove justice, and what are kingdoms but great bands of robbers?' (latrocinia).²⁷
IV. Part III: Diagnostic Machinery — The JROspace ABCDE Model
To systematically evaluate how powerful figures evade accountability, Appendix A introduces the JROspace ABCDE Model—a 5-stage diagnostic framework mapping authority assertions to their inevitable failure or narrative insulation:²⁸
JROspace Stage | Operational Definition | Systemic Failure Mechanism |
Stage A: Identity Claim | Actor asserts elevated standing, divine mandate, or specialized expertise. | Creates unearned expectation of authority and moral legitimacy. |
Stage B: Obligation Rejection | Actor uses shortcuts, defensive slogans, or religious branding to bypass statutory duties. | Severing duty from title triggers immediate ethical breakdown. |
Stage C: Outcome Ownership Failure | Actor refuses responsibility for real-world policy harms inflicted on constituents. | Identity is preserved at the expense of constituent welfare. |
Stage D: Accountability Pressure | Empirical facts, investigative journalism, and public critique confront authority claims. | External reality exposes the gap between rhetoric and policy impact. |
Stage E: Collapse / Insulation | Actor either faces structural collapse or constructs protective narrative bubbles. | Unaccountable power must suppress truth to prevent total collapse. |
V. Part IV: Empirical Case Studies in Moral Inversion & Epistemic Failure
Appendices C and E execute detailed empirical case studies applying the ABCDE model and biblical policy crosswalk to two chief architects of Project 2025:²⁹
A. Russell Vought (Executive Domain / OMB Case Study)
Stage A Identity Claim: Proclaims 'laws come from God' and advocates for 'faith-aligned governance' in Project 2025, positioning himself as a Christian constitutional architect.³⁰
Granular Policy Crosswalk (Moral Inversion): Project 2025 proposals drafted under Vought's influence—gutting CFPB predatory lending safeguards, cutting SNAP food assistance, restricting Medicaid access, and rolling back OSHA/NLRB workplace standards—execute a direct 'Moral Inversion' of Deuteronomy 24:14 ('Thou shalt not oppress a hired servant') and Leviticus 25.³¹
Stage C/E Failure (Outcome Ownership Avoidance): As OMB Director, Vought approved reductions in VA medical services and caregiver support (opposed by veteran groups DAV, VFW, IAVA). Simultaneously, Vought quietly transferred $600M from Secret Service and military accounts to construct a luxury White House ballroom—refusing responsibility for veteran care lapses while diverting funds to executive luxury.³²
B. Brendan Carr (Regulatory Domain / FCC Case Study)
Stage A Identity Claim: Authors Project 2025 Chapter 28 (FCC), claiming a conservative mandate to 'promote free speech' and dismantle Big Tech censorship.³³
Stage B Obligation Rejection: Disregards the Communications Act (47 U.S.C. § 326) anti-censorship limits and eliminates local media consolidation caps, allowing corporate conglomerates to monopolize local broadcast news.³⁴
Stage C/E Failure (Narrative Insulation): When local news consolidation caused mass journalist layoffs and political satire confronted FCC policy, Carr threatened broadcast license revocations for ABC, CBS, NBC, and PBS—weaponizing regulatory state power to suppress critical speech and insulate his narrative bubble.³⁵
VI. Part V: The Unified Four-Part Monograph Conclusion
Bringing together the canonical scripture, Information Operations critique, diagnostic modeling, and empirical case studies yields four definitive conclusions:
1. The 'Moral Inversion' Thesis: Christian nationalism does not merely fail to apply biblical ethics—it executes a complete Moral Inversion. Where scripture explicitly commands the protection of the poor (Deut. 24:14), restraint of monarchical wealth (Deut. 17), and open truth-testing (parrhesia), Project 2025 policies strip social safety nets, enrich elite executive projects, and weaponize state regulatory machinery to suppress public critique.³⁶
2. Self-Executing Forfeiture of Authority: Under both Old Testament covenantal law (b'rit) and New Testament Red Letters (diakonia and oikonomia), authority is strictly conditional, fiduciary, and non-possessory. Any attempt to assert civic or spiritual power while repudiating ethical obligations, oversight, and care for the vulnerable (eleos) automatically invalidates its own moral legitimacy under the biblical canon.³⁷
3. The Epistemic Collapse Requirement: Because authority divorced from accountability cannot survive exposure to empirical reality (Stage D Pressure), it must resort to material budget redirection (Russell Vought) or state-sanctioned speech suppression (Brendan Carr) to insulate its narrative bubble (Stage E Collapse Prevention). Rejection of accountability marks Christian nationalism not as authentic Christian governance, but as an authoritarian survival mechanism that biblically, logically, and empirically ensures its own structural collapse.³⁸
4. Empirical Sociological Validation: Empirical research by sociologists Andrew L. Whitehead & Samuel L. Perry (Taking America Back for God) and Philip S. Gorski & Samuel L. Perry (The Flag and the Cross) demonstrates that Christian nationalism functions as a political ideology seeking cultural dominance and raw power rather than personal theological adherence, spiritual practice, or ethical accountability. This sociological evidence confirms the diagnostic framework: the deployment of religious identity markers without ethical performance operates as an Information Operations (IO) strategy of symbolic branding designed to claim unearned civic authority.³⁹
VII. Footnotes (Chicago Manual of Style)
1. John Russell Rozean, "APPENDIX X: 2/3 OT 1/3 NT Analysis of Authority and Accountability from Christianity," Monograph Series: Authority and Accountability in Christian Perspective (2026), Section 1, https://johnrozean.wixsite.com/mysite/single-post/appendix-x-2-3-ot-1-3-nt-analysis-of-authority-and-accountability-from-christianity.
2. Ibid., Methodological Overview & Canonical Ratio.
3. John Russell Rozean, "APPENDIX D: Symbolic Branding vs. Ethical Accountability," Monograph Series (2026), Executive Abstract, https://www.full-of-doubt.net/post/appendix-d-symbolic-branding-vs-ethical-accountability.
4. John Russell Rozean, "APPENDIX F: Scriptural Annotated Bibliography and Hermeneutical Synthesis on Jubilee, Levitical Law, and New Testament Continuity," Monograph Series (2026), https://www.ridedatiger.com/single-post/appendix-f-scriptural-annotated-bibliography-and-hermeneutical-synthesis-on-jubilee-levitical-law.
5. John Russell Rozean, "Appendix B: Symbolic Branding vs. Ethical Accountability & the Bible," Monograph Series (2026), https://www.ridedatiger.com/single-post/appendix-b-symbolic-branding-vs-ethical-accountability-the-bible.
6. John Russell Rozean, "Appendix A: The General JROspace ABCDE Model," Monograph Series (2026), https://cultofintelligence.info/f/appendix-a-the-general-jrospace-abcde-model.
7. John Russell Rozean, "APPENDIX C: Structural Contradiction Between Biblical Mandates and Project 2025 Policy Actions," Monograph Series (2026), https://www.full-of-doubt.net/post/appendix-c-structural-contradiction-between-biblical-mandates-and-project-2025-policy-actions; John Russell Rozean, "APPENDIX E: Empirical Case Studies in Authority-Accountability Failure," Monograph Series (2026), https://johnrozean.wixsite.com/mysite/single-post/appendix-e-empirical-case-studies-in-authority-accountability-failure.
8. Appendix X, Methodological Overview & Canonical Ratio.
9. Gen. 17:1; Exod. 19:5 (NRSV); Appendix X, Section 1.1.
10. Amos 5:24; Ps. 82:3 (NRSV); Appendix X, Section 1.2.
11. Deut. 17:14–20 (NRSV); Appendix X, Section 1.3.
12. 1 Sam. 15:22; 2 Sam. 12:1–15; 1 Kings 21:1–29; Ezek. 34:1–16; Deut. 28:1–68 (NRSV); Appendix X, Section 1.2–1.4.
13. Matt. 20:25–28; John 13:1–17 (NRSV); Appendix X, Section 2.1.
14. Matt. 23:1–36; Luke 11:46 (NRSV); Appendix X, Section 2.2.
15. Luke 12:48; Matt. 25:14–30 (NRSV); Appendix X, Section 2.3.
16. Matt. 25:31–46; John 5:22–30 (NRSV); Appendix X, Section 2.3.
17. Appendix F, Section 1–2.
18. Lev. 18:22; Lev. 25:1–55 (NRSV); John Russell Rozean, "Jubilee, Selective Enforcement, and the Inconsistency of Modern Christian Appeals to Levitical Law," Full of Doubt Studies (June 29, 2026), https://www.full-of-doubt.net/post/jubilee-selective-enforcement-and-the-inconsistency-of-modern-christian-appeals-to-levitical-law.
19. Luke 4:18–19; Acts 4:34–35 (NRSV); John Russell Rozean, "Jubilee, Leviticus, Acts 4, and the Theological Failure of Selective Scripture," Ride Da Tiger Theological Series (June 29, 2026), https://www.ridedatiger.com/single-post/jubilee-levitical-acts-4-and-the-theological-failure-of-selective-scripture.
20. Gal. 3:24; Gal. 5:3; Rom. 6:14; Col. 2:14 (NRSV); Appendix F, Section 2.2.
21. Appendix B, Section 1; Appendix D, Section 1.
22. Appendix D, Executive Abstract & Section 1.
23. Ruth Braunstein, "Media and the Framing of Religious Nationalism," Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 60, no. 2 (2021): 310–325; Appendix B, Section 1.2.
24. Stanley Hauerwas, Christian Existence Today: Essays on Church, World, and Living in Between (Brazos Press, 2001), 15–32.
25. Dietrich Bonhoeffer, Ethics, ed. Eberhard Bethge (Touchstone, 1995), 84–102.
26. John Howard Yoder, The Politics of Jesus, 2nd ed. (Eerdmans, 1994), 115–140.
27. Augustine of Hippo, City of God, trans. Henry Bettenson (Penguin Books, 2003), Book XIX, chap. 12–17.
28. Appendix A: The General JROspace ABCDE Model, Stages A–E.
29. Appendix C, Section 1; Appendix E, Section 1–2.
30. Heritage Foundation, Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise (Project 2025) (Washington, D.C., 2023), 1–15; ProPublica, "Inside Project 2025's Executive Power Strategy: Russell Vought" (2024).
31. Deut. 24:14; Lev. 25:1–55 (NRSV); Appendix C, Section 2.
32. New York Times / ProPublica Investigation into OMB Executive Transfers, cited in Appendix C, Section 3; Appendix E, Section 1.
33. Heritage Foundation, Project 2025, Chapter 28: Federal Communications Commission, by Brendan Carr, 837–860; Appendix E, Section 2.
34. 47 U.S.C. § 326; Tom Wheeler, "Not Deregulation but Heavy-Handed Regulation at the Trump FCC," Brookings Institution Commentary (Feb. 25, 2025).
35. Columbia Journalism Review, "Brendan Carr's Deregulation Blitz Is a Disaster for TV News" (Oct. 20, 2025); Free Press, "FCC Chairman Carr's Threat to Pull ABC Broadcast Licenses Is an Unconstitutional Attack on Free Speech" (April 28, 2026); Appendix E, Section 2.
36. Appendix C, Section 4 (Moral Inversion Matrix).
37. Appendix X, Section 3 (Unified Canonical Rule).
38. Appendix E, Section 3 (Comparative Trajectories).
39. Andrew L. Whitehead and Samuel L. Perry, Taking America Back for God: Christian Nationalism in the United States (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2020), 52–75; Philip S. Gorski and Samuel L. Perry, The Flag and the Cross: White Christian Nationalism and the Threat to American Democracy (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2022), 88–112; Appendix D, Section 2.
VIII. Works Cited (Chicago Style Bibliography)
Augustine of Hippo. City of God. Translated by Henry Bettenson. London: Penguin Books, 2003.
Biblia Hebraica Stuttgartensia. Edited by Karl Elliger and Wilhelm Rudolph. 5th rev. ed. Stuttgart: Deutsche Bibelgesellschaft, 1997.
Bonhoeffer, Dietrich. Ethics. Edited by Eberhard Bethge. New York: Touchstone, 1995.
Braunstein, Ruth. "Media and the Framing of Religious Nationalism." Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 60, no. 2 (2021): 310–325.
Columbia Journalism Review. "Brendan Carr's Deregulation Blitz Is a Disaster for TV News." CJR Analysis, October 20, 2025.
Free Press. "FCC Chairman Carr's Threat to Pull ABC Broadcast Licenses Is an Unconstitutional Attack on Free Speech." Press Release, April 28, 2026.
Gorski, Philip S., and Samuel L. Perry. The Flag and the Cross: White Christian Nationalism and the Threat to American Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2022.
Hauerwas, Stanley. Christian Existence Today: Essays on Church, World, and Living in Between. Grand Rapids, MI: Brazos Press, 2001.
Heritage Foundation, The. Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise (Project 2025). Washington, D.C.: The Heritage Foundation, 2023.
Novum Testamentum Graece. Edited by Barbara and Kurt Aland et al. 28th rev. ed. Stuttgart: Deutsche Bibelgesellschaft, 2012.
ProPublica. "Inside Project 2025's Executive Power Strategy: Russell Vought." ProPublica Investigative Reports, 2024.
Rozean, John Russell. "Appendix A: The General JROspace ABCDE Model." Cult of Intelligence Policy Frameworks, October 4, 2026. https://cultofintelligence.info/f/appendix-a-the-general-jrospace-abcde-model.
Rozean, John Russell. "Appendix B: Symbolic Branding vs. Ethical Accountability & the Bible." Ride Da Tiger Monograph Series, October 4, 2026. https://www.ridedatiger.com/single-post/appendix-b-symbolic-branding-vs-ethical-accountability-the-bible.
Rozean, John Russell. "APPENDIX C: Structural Contradiction Between Biblical Mandates and Project 2025 Policy Actions." Full of Doubt Monograph Series, October 4, 2026. https://www.full-of-doubt.net/post/appendix-c-structural-contradiction-between-biblical-mandates-and-project-2025-policy-actions.
Rozean, John Russell. "APPENDIX D: Symbolic Branding vs. Ethical Accountability." Full of Doubt Monograph Series, October 4, 2026. https://www.full-of-doubt.net/post/appendix-d-symbolic-branding-vs-ethical-accountability.
Rozean, John Russell. "APPENDIX E: Empirical Case Studies in Authority-Accountability Failure." JROspace Monograph Series, October 4, 2026. https://johnrozean.wixsite.com/mysite/single-post/appendix-e-empirical-case-studies-in-authority-accountability-failure.
Rozean, John Russell. "APPENDIX F: Scriptural Annotated Bibliography and Hermeneutical Synthesis on Jubilee, Levitical Law, and New Testament Continuity." Ride Da Tiger Monograph Series, October 4, 2026. https://www.ridedatiger.com/single-post/appendix-f-scriptural-annotated-bibliography-and-hermeneutical-synthesis-on-jubilee-levitical-law.
Rozean, John Russell. "APPENDIX X: 2/3 OT 1/3 NT Analysis of Authority and Accountability from Christianity." JROspace Monograph Series, October 4, 2026. https://johnrozean.wixsite.com/mysite/single-post/appendix-x-2-3-ot-1-3-nt-analysis-of-authority-and-accountability-from-christianity.
Rozean, John Russell. "Jubilee, Leviticus, Acts 4, and the Theological Failure of Selective Scripture." Ride Da Tiger Theological Series, June 29, 2026. https://www.ridedatiger.com/single-post/jubilee-levitical-acts-4-and-the-theological-failure-of-selective-scripture.
Rozean, John Russell. "Jubilee, Selective Enforcement, and the Inconsistency of Modern Christian Appeals to Levitical Law." Full of Doubt Studies, June 29, 2026. https://www.full-of-doubt.net/post/jubilee-selective-enforcement-and-the-inconsistency-of-modern-christian-appeals-to-levitical-law.
The Holy Bible. New Revised Standard Version (NRSV). Nashville, TN: Thomas Nelson Publishers, 1989.
Wheeler, Tom. "Not Deregulation but Heavy-Handed Regulation at the Trump FCC." Brookings Institution Commentary, February 25, 2025.
Whitehead, Andrew L., and Samuel L. Perry. Taking America Back for God: Christian Nationalism in the United States. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2020.
Yoder, John Howard. The Politics of Jesus: Vicit Agnus Noster. 2nd ed. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 1994.
Comments